Digital Paint Discussion Board
Fairness Enforcement => Cheater Reports and Bans => Topic started by: Bix on February 07, 2009, 06:22:52 PM
-
Title says it all.
Impactz -
http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=8ff642e6100b3611af924764f9977b1de04e75f6e8ebb871
19:50
18:30
17:30
17:10 (one of the best)
16:20
16:00
15:05
14:30
14:05
13:50
13:10
12:30
11:50
11:25 (way to plow the wall)
11:05 (nice shooting the wall)
9:10
6:50
6:15 (Where the hell is that going? got a lol)
4:30
4:01
3:40
2:40 (love the reaction before you can see him)
2:05 (LOL this one is great)
Annal (used to be Clon3d)-
http://fastfreeupload.com/download.php?file=703For_u_baby.dm2
19:30
19:00
18:50 (plow that wall!)
18:20 (this kid is obvious)
17:50
17:30 (watcha looking at?)
16:59 (reacting and knowing where he is?)
16:25
--looked away
13:40
12:40 (plowing walls)
12:25 (way to know)
12:05 (staring through walls!)
10:40
10;20
9:40 (LOl what you shooting at?)
8:40 (another great one)
6:00
4:01 (shoot his exact spot next time)
3:40
2:50 (another LOL)
2:40 (already aiming perfectly?)
1:30
:55
:34 (YOU GET THAT WALL!)
***Note, those are only the times where i was watching and it seems to be very evident.
PLEASE DO NOT FUSE THIS WITH THE OTHER THREAD. IT IS SEPARATE EVIDENCE AND IT INVOLVES OTHER PEOPLE. THANKS KNACKY!
-
Watched Impactz and put funny times. Clon3d's times to come soon.
-
ROLF u serieus u think i hack ?
my demo is ok its a normal demo ...
idk why u said funny time ...
i watched my demo and ... they is no way to wallhacking
i dont understand really cuz i dont hack ..
sry for my english :S
-
lmfao, pretty blatant. I find it humorous that they even gave you their demos. How could they even think those demos do not provide enough evidence to ban them? Smooth one champs.
-
I've been hearing they wont give their demos up. Probably my supreme skill that made them give me their demos.
-
good you're both horrible. you could have at least tried to not make it obvious.
-
ROLF u serieus u think i hack ?
my demo is ok its a normal demo ...
idk why u said funny time ...
i watched my demo and ... they is no way to wallhacking
i dont understand really cuz i dont hack ..
sry for my english :S
I am pretty serious d00d. I hope this sets an example for all the others using modified content.
The denial, the blatantsy, cheating in a match..I think they deserve 64 says.
-
Error
This file is neither allocated to a Premium Account, or a Collector's Account, and can therefore only be downloaded 10 times.
This limit is reached.
To download this file, the uploader either needs to transfer this file into his/her Collector's Account, or upload the file again. The file can later be moved to a Collector's Account. The uploader just needs to click the delete link of the file to get further information.
-
New links up Rick
-
it will be not fair cuz i dont hack idk why u guys say that
-
yeah i dont theink they hack, they are lucky maybe?
-
It was pretty obvious from the warm-up in each demo. The first demo, this kid was in blue spawn and shooting the guy through the X. On the second one, the other dummy head was shooting at the high autococker through the wall.
Congrats on your bans.
-
yeah i dont theink they hack, they are lucky maybe?
I am Santa clause just so you know.
Did you even bother to watch either of the demos?
it will be not fair cuz i dont hack idk why u guys say that
Have someone proof read your posts on IRC. They don't make sense. Like having a lawyer who doesn't speak the language of where the trial is...doesn't help your case.
-
On the 2ed demo it look like he was.He looked in the middle thing with no recon looked over and bam he was dead (3iob Member)
-
I watched the first demo, in my own opinion, all those times can be attributed to lucky lines, recon, and just plain seeing you go somewhere. I do not think (whoever Noob is) hacks, I will watch the other one later.
-
ok i didnt watch the demo :-\ befor i said that and now i did and my answer would be WAY DIFFERENT :)
-
In the first demo theres really no sufficient evidence tbh. In the second one...wow thats a different story. Clearly hacking IMO..
-
In the first demo theres really no sufficient evidence tbh. In the second one...wow thats a different story. Clearly hacking IMO..
I agree completely, after watching a couple minutes of the second demo, that is clean and clear proof of wallhacks.
-
Both demos are very obvious. You're on something if you can't tell from the 1st.
-
In the first demo theres really no sufficient evidence tbh. In the second one...wow thats a different story. Clearly hacking IMO..
:). A few of the times it could've been recon in the first demo, but there was a few moments in there where it looked like he did. Just watched the 2nd, after the first 2 minutes it was clearly obvious.
-
Are you guys smoking? I encourage you to watch both demos WITH wallhacks on.
NOTE: If you don't know how to properly watch a demo with wallhacks i would not recommend doing it.
Just can't believe you do not think they hack, pathetic.
-
I watched this meddling demo again. If you don't think this kid is wallhacking, you don't know what one looks like.
19:40
1810
1720
1710
1632
1620
1505
1450
1350
1305
1110(the whole battle)
6:15 LOL the kid plows the wall where someone is.
200 (once again owns a wall)
30 secs (shoots where someone is?)
-
I said the 2nd one was obvious within the first 2 minutes. The first one, there was just a few times that it could've been recon. I didn't say he wasn't wall hacking. There is a fair possibility that he was, because some of it did look suspicious.
-
I can agree with you cameron. I just encourage you to look at it with wallhacks. There is times when he is shooting through BIG walls exactly where people are. After this issue is looked into more it will be very obvious both are cheating.
-
I am pretty sure I posted in the correct section. Why did my thread get moved when many others don't? Why did TiNi's thread for instance not gain the same respect as mine yet both are very similar and involving the same people? Another reason why this forum is disfunctional.
Anyways, it is intuitively obvious that their suspicious activity is clearly wallhacks. I have other points that i have brought up with a few committee members. They will not be discussed here because they could be determined as teaching people how to 'cheat'.
I am also somewhat disappointed in how some of the former and current committee members do not see how obvious this is.
This needs to be an example to all those who are using the modified content wallhack. You will get caught, and you will get a heavy ban. Anyone with this wallhack isn't your pub newbie who downloaded the game and has ZGH.
-
I am pretty sure I posted in the correct section. Why did my thread get moved when many others don't? Why did TiNi's thread for instance not gain the same respect as mine yet both are very similar and involving the same people? Another reason why this forum is disfunctional.
You want this brought up by the committee? It gets moved. Respect works both ways....
Geez........
-
17:20 (iknew they was there i saw them and they was lining me)
17:10 (i had recon)
16:32 (?? whats the problem)
16:20 (i got a recon he was mid)
15:05(lining shot... i shoot always FD first when im chek)
14:50(??? i droped and i saw him)
13:50(i just looked mid and he was nobody
13:05( recon chek..lucky shot ..)
11:10( ???recon)
6:15(?? i always shoot you always say that i +attack so i can have some moment of distraction no... )
2:00(my friend died and i knew he was mid so i looked back)
30(??? +attack)
-
I am pretty sure I posted in the correct section. Why did my thread get moved when many others don't? Why did TiNi's thread for instance not gain the same respect as mine yet both are very similar and involving the same people? Another reason why this forum is disfunctional.
Anyways, it is intuitively obvious that their suspicious activity is clearly wallhacks. I have other points that i have brought up with a few committee members. They will not be discussed here because they could be determined as teaching people how to 'cheat'.
I am also somewhat disappointed in how some of the former and current committee members do not see how obvious this is.
This needs to be an example to all those who are using the modified content wallhack. You will get caught, and you will get a heavy ban. Anyone with this wallhack isn't your pub newbie who downloaded the game and has ZGH.
Well, to be honest you have been accusing quite some pleople of hacking lately so pardon us if we dont believe you right away. Anyway, everyone is saying they are clearly hacking and you keep saying we dont see its obvious for some reason...
I wouldnt ban anyone based on that first demo. But this is just my opinion. In the SECOND demo its obvious, as you said, that he is hacking, but this is also just my opinion. Now just relax, this will be taken care of.
-
They both wallhack, especially Impactz, aren't there like 3 threads on this kid already and yet no one has done anything about it?
-
More proof that there are a lot of idiots on the committee.
Also, I don't recall Bix accusing anyone lately, and I'm also sure whoever he has accused in the past were hacking.
-
Olbaid, if you want a quick example yesterday this guy came to me telling me bix was accusing him of hacking. He was also afraid you would influence the committee somehow because you are his friend. Off course I immidiatly denied that you could influence anyone in the committee, wich is true as far as I see. But this just so you know how much the people in the game trust the committee. And it's not because of the "idiot" members...
-
..... In this case, I did feel the 128 day ban for modified textures might be harsh at first, but then after checking some logs and seeing that Homingbullet had modified maps and even ran ratbot again recently, I don't think it's unjustified. .....
Quoted from http://dplogin.com/forums/index.php?topic=12544.240
Well based on what jitspoe said, WOuldnt it show in the logs if they used the wallhacks or not? Apparently it do. So why is this taking so long for Jits and the commitee to come up with an verdict?
-
Maybe because the post is 2 days old?
-
Quoted from http://dplogin.com/forums/index.php?topic=12544.240
Well based on what jitspoe said, WOuldnt it show in the logs if they used the wallhacks or not? Apparently it do. So why is this taking so long for Jits and the commitee to come up with an verdict?
We have lifes.
-
Maybe because the post is 2 days old?
But if all it takes is a look at the logs, They have the time and dates. It should be fast and simple to check.
-
How many times has Jitspoe posted on this topic? None. He clearly hasn't seen it yet. Give it time.
-
How many times has Jitspoe posted on this topic? None. He clearly hasn't seen it yet. Give it time.
Correct.
Jits usually does not get on the forums on the weekends.
-
Well, to be honest you have been accusing quite some pleople of hacking lately so pardon us if we dont believe you right away. Anyway, everyone is saying they are clearly hacking and you keep saying we dont see its obvious for some reason...
I wouldnt ban anyone based on that first demo. But this is just my opinion. In the SECOND demo its obvious, as you said, that he is hacking, but this is also just my opinion. Now just relax, this will be taken care of.
Ok, pal. I have accused ***FIVE*** people of hacking. Why don't we take a look?
-Homingbullet and Want3d..both were banned due to obvious aimbots.
-Navyseal was banned for a speedhack which was obvious and i still believe he wallhacks.
-Annal and Impactz. Run BOTH their demos WITH wallhacks and see what i am talking about. Both these champs should be banned very soon with very harsh punishments to prove to the rest of the community that we will NOT tolerate modified content.
Magh why don't you get off your ass and DO what i told you to do. If you had taken the time to run their demos with a wallhack you would actually see how obvious it is. It appears most people I accuse do in fact hack. Also, I would love to see some proof that i said someone was hacking. Anyone that I think is cheating has a thread made here. I don't lose, so why would i report someone over that? Anyways, so anyone that has friends in the committee is playing favorites? I could claim that I think you are playing favorites with the Euros...how does that feel Magh?
Finally and furthermore this thread just reassuring my thoughts that the committee in the past and current was not/is not capable of doing the job correctly nor ready to fully look into the subject. Unfortunately nearly all of the issues that are brought into the committee deal with multi accounts and frankly I don't give a excrement about that. The issues that matter...true CHEATING, the committee can't handle or correctly deal with. Pathetic.
Hope you don't get too mad Knack. I am simply defending myself from attacks and using factual information along with analogies to prove my point.
-
Jesus Christ is good to see you know how to play with words and completely distort what I said.
"Off course I immediately denied that you could influence anyone in the committee, wich is true as far as I see"
Thats what I said. You can read it above.
Also, the person wich I'm talking about does not show up on that list of yours, so someone is lying here. (NOT saying its you, altough he did say you said you ran his demo with wallhacks on as you reccomend me to do.)
errr...what else...Oh no one attacked you here.
When we discuss this in the committee I will see the demos with wallhacks. You just shouldn't be able to accuse the committee like that giving no examples whatsoever of what you are talking about. In this post EVERY committee member says they are hacking apart from me who have doubts in the first one (not giving 200 days bans without knowing for sure, I'm sorry) and you still shout to who wants to hear it that the committee cant see, cant handle problems and sh.it.
Now relax and just wait because this will be taken care off. Maybe the guys even show up in the cheat detection and you are crying for no reason.
Obviously I'm not as good with words as you but I hope you guys understand me anyway.
-
Post removed
-
Sadly I have only downloaded wallhacks once and it was for this instance. ZGH to be exact. Therefore I could not have told anyone that ***I*** was running wallhacks on a demo. I have files (fraps etc) that show demos with wallhacks from other people. Big difference.
I believe you are referring to myers, therefore his words are incorrect.
EDIT: DT, you are pretty much always correct since you are relatively close to being on the level of god. That is pretty much the same case, and justice will probably not be done in this case.
-
Finally and furthermore this thread just reassuring my thoughts that the committee in the past and current was not/is not capable of doing the job correctly nor ready to fully look into the subject. Unfortunately nearly all of the issues that are brought into the committee deal with multi accounts and frankly I don't give a excrement about that. The issues that matter...true CHEATING, the committee can't handle or correctly deal with. Pathetic.
....
You do realize that Jits implements the final decision? Why don't you start attacking him for taking his sweet a$$ time?
-
I don't really care how long he takes. I just hope he gives them a very stiff penalty to set an example for everyone using modified content.
-
Then be patient...
-
My quote you posted is no where near relevant to your point.
-
These two are sadly already forgotten. Hopefully the correct decisions will be made.
-
This isn't going to get locked for committee review? Glad to see you put some newbie posting a demo of immuned walling over this.
-
Actually this is NOW locked.
We shall see what the idiots have to say about it. Sorry that no one else can perform to your standards.
Oh, see ya in 7.
-
Unlocking this. Ban added for impactz. 64 days unless he comes clean.
-
Do you have any proof in his system this same thing happen to clon3d the did not find a thing. Here we go again.
-
Do you have any proof in his system this same thing happen to clon3d the did not find a thing. Here we go again.
Wait huh?
If you go watch a demo of his uhh, how long ago was it Bix, you seem to remember :P. It was the most obvious thing I had EVER seen.
-
Do you have any proof in his system this same thing happen to clon3d the did not find a thing. Here we go again.
That sentence made absolutely no sense.
-
Do you have any proof in his system this same thing happen to clon3d the did not find a thing. Here we go again.
Translation:
Did you find the source of the hack in the system? Or are you just going by the demo. The same thing happened to clon3d, nothing was found yet he still got banned. Here we go again...
EDIT: Might not of perfectly translated it. I'm not fluent in nick123's language.
-
Nick123, if you watched the demo without being biased you would clearly see he is cheating.
-
Still its a demo theres nothing on his system nothing was there why ban someone a demo is a demo nothing can be said by a demo.
-
Still its a demo theres nothing on his system nothing was there why ban someone a demo is a demo nothing can be said by a demo.
Excuse me? Want to bet? Aimbotters twitch. Most obvious thing ever. Aimbotters shoot at walls, and if you watch it with wallhacks, I'm sure you have some, you will see that the lines are directly hitting the player, but on the wall.
-
hes obv. banned
-
Do you have any proof in his system this same thing happen to clon3d the did not find a thing. Here we go again.
This demo shows that he did twitch from hi killed him then twitched low.
That quote is from Redneck's topic.
So, this shows how biased you are. In one, you claim demo's can't prove anything. In the other, you find a point in a demo to say that he's hacking.
-
Excuse me? Want to bet? Aimbotters twitch. Most obvious thing ever. Aimbotters shoot at walls, and if you watch it with wallhacks, I'm sure you have some, you will see that the lines are directly hitting the player, but on the wall.
LMFAO i wall? still lmfao someone that hardle plays should talk eh? and i don't wall....
And all the times you say people wall with now proof but a demo is really sad now cmon everyone lines the walls don't they?
-
LMFAO i wall? still lmfao someone that hardle plays should talk eh? and i don't wall....
And all the times you say people wall with now proof but a demo is really sad now cmon everyone lines the walls don't they?
Nick obv. cameron has been playing longer then you and has seen this happen many times. A demo can show you lots of stuff. So as Justinph5 said you are biased for some people but stick up for others.
-
..
-
That had to of been the most pointless post i have ever seen. Nick watch the demo, he clearly wallhacked. His crosshair stays on people through walls, thats enough evidence.
-
kk i'm done.
-
See this is what happens when people try to protect others, a thread like this starts. Nick tries to protect Impactz. And nick, don't lie to me, I know what hacks you have and dont have.
-
K ban me see what hacks come up if you think your so wright CMON think your smart and know what hacks i have this is is so stupid somone thinks he knows everything is saying this.
-
I would be careful how you draw attention to yourself nick...
FluKe/nick123 (42383)
Reason: Modifed content, aimbot
Created: 2009-03-11 22:43:38, Modified: 2009-04-12 20:39:17, Expires: 2009-04-12 20:39:17
Days Left: Expired
Discussion: http://dplogin.com/forums/index.php?topic=16525
You've been caught once.....
-
that was before do i still have hacks sir no i don't not trying to be disrespectful but he does not need to go saying i still have hacks anyone can go on my computer and check if they want....
-
Nick just chill before you get a forum ban lol. Anyways Impactz got banned that's the end of that don't stick up for him he walled he got banned easy as that you'll see him in 2 months or if he gives jits his walls a month please just lock this back up :)
-
indeed lock it but cam is wrong.
-
I am wrong? Why? Prove me why I'm wrong, because so far not many people in this community would trust you, or what you say, or your judgements, etc.
-
I had to read each of nick's posts three times to understand. Then I laughed.
Nick, just stop talking please. You are wrong and making yourself look stupid.
-
So i still hack and your so positive about this?
-
Still its a demo theres nothing on his system nothing was there why ban someone a demo is a demo nothing can be said by a demo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX6XMIldkRU
the proof is the proof. Is good proof, that proof
-
No, a proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof, and when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven.
-
So i still hack and your so positive about this?
I truly don't even understand you.
-
Post removed