Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

September 08, 2010, 04:43:01 AM
Show unread posts since last visit.

Home | Help | Search | Login | Register

Pages: [1] 2 3
Print
Author Topic: Feature: New map format  (Read 5905 times)
Cobo
Autococker

Posts: 1361

« on: January 05, 2008, 07:28:23 PM »

Move away from the quake 2 bsp format into something better. I really dont know what other options there are though. (q3 I guess)

I would like to see things like concave brushes or patches.

If you dont know what patches are, here's a pic of it on BSP, sort was working on implementing them on BSP.


Logged
P!nk
Autococker

Posts: 912

_
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2008, 07:43:57 PM »

Post removed
« Last Edit: July 26, 2010, 03:02:00 AM by P!nk » Logged
DaRkNeSS
Autococker

Posts: 624

« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2008, 08:00:51 PM »

Why do people want a map review board?  Who are you to shoot down someone's map?  If a map gets played a lot then obviously people like it, so there is no point in having some map review board who can try to control the map releases.
Logged
jitspoe
Administrator
Autococker

Posts: 14137

« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2008, 08:02:02 PM »

The game already has "soft shadows".  Real-time soft shadows, however, don't have much to do with the map format.  A new map format will basically just alow more detail to be drawn faster and possibly have a scalable level of detail so that more detailed maps will be able to run on older hardware.
Logged
Cobo
Autococker

Posts: 1361

« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2008, 08:55:37 PM »

http://dplogin.com/dplogin/featurevote/feature.php?id=10019
Logged
Garrett
Autococker

Posts: 1374

« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2008, 01:47:08 AM »

The more graphical updates to the maps, the better.  How would you be able to use a q3 map in a q2 based game?
Logged
P!nk
Autococker

Posts: 912

_
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2008, 02:18:46 AM »

Post removed
« Last Edit: July 26, 2010, 03:01:54 AM by P!nk » Logged
sk89q
Global Moderator
Autococker

Posts: 1037

« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2008, 02:30:16 AM »

I think a free market would work better. Besides that, there's not actually a way to regulate what maps get played, unless of course, the silly idea of a list of map file checksums is proposed...
Logged
MosheD
VM-68

Posts: 101

« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2008, 06:09:04 AM »

In association with a new map format, the maps, which being redone should be realeased with an official mappack*. By making official maps like in e.g. warsow, the big amount of useless maps would be deleted and more 'matchable' maps would be played. Of course you should put some pubmaps into the pack, but not too much. See the warsow example, none complains about just playing like 15 maps all the time.

*The community/committee/skilled mapmaker could vote, which maps should be redone in the new format and realeased.
Logged
sk89q
Global Moderator
Autococker

Posts: 1037

« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2008, 11:48:05 AM »

Whatever "official maps" get bundled with Paintball doesn't matter I think. Given fast downloads now, pubs determine what maps newbies play.
Logged
Cobo
Autococker

Posts: 1361

« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2008, 04:41:24 PM »

In association with a new map format, the maps, which being redone should be realeased with an official mappack*. By making official maps like in e.g. warsow, the big amount of useless maps would be deleted and more 'matchable' maps would be played. Of course you should put some pubmaps into the pack, but not too much. See the warsow example, none complains about just playing like 15 maps all the time.

*The community/committee/skilled mapmaker could vote, which maps should be redone in the new format and realeased.
I think the current map supprt should be kept for backward compatability.
Logged
Garrett
Autococker

Posts: 1374

« Reply #11 on: January 06, 2008, 05:13:18 PM »

I think the current map supprt should be kept for backward compatability.
I second that.  If there is a new map format, some errors could arise when trying to use the old maps.
Logged
cusoman
68 Carbine

Posts: 459

« Reply #12 on: January 06, 2008, 06:54:09 PM »

Yes, why not just have the engine be able to support q2 and q3 .bsp files, and just use q3 dynamic lighting in everything.  Then every map looks better, old maps can be played, and new maps will be in the rather robust q3 .bsp format.
-Cusoman
Logged
jitspoe
Administrator
Autococker

Posts: 14137

« Reply #13 on: January 06, 2008, 11:17:30 PM »

Q3's dynamic lighting was worse than Q2's (albeit faster on some video cards).
Logged
webhead
Committee Member
Autococker

Posts: 619

« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2008, 12:56:15 AM »

any idea how difficult this idea would be to implement? i would imagine it's no small task - given that it means a complete overhaul of the engine (right?).
Logged
y00tz
Global Moderator
Autococker

Posts: 2742

« Reply #15 on: January 29, 2008, 01:03:28 AM »

The whole united states is covered in 4 feet of silver dollars, except one silver dollar is a red one, hardly a silver dollar I guess...
You parachute out of a plane, and randomly land near Dallas, TX.
You reach behind you with your left arm, and dig 15.4inches, and grab a silver dollar.
It's the red one, and it says:
"Wow y00tz,  this is one long ass analogy"

The odds are greater of that happening then they are for people to vote for a new map format at the risk of losing those gems we play now, you know, Blitz... Barrels... Rally21...

edit:  And heaven forbid the 2000 jump maps... tsk
Logged
webhead
Committee Member
Autococker

Posts: 619

« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2008, 02:15:38 AM »

y00tz...

I think the current map support should be kept for backward compatibility.
Logged
cusoman
68 Carbine

Posts: 459

« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2008, 02:29:34 PM »

Actually I think y00tz was using a sort of double-satire, and was actually supporting the new map format.
-Cusoman

PS: I hate having to type out things instead of speak them, because the meaning always gets lost somewhere.
Logged
webhead
Committee Member
Autococker

Posts: 619

« Reply #18 on: January 29, 2008, 05:30:44 PM »

Actually I think y00tz was using a sort of double-satire, and was actually supporting the new map format.
i know Wink but with backward compatibility, people would be more likely to vote for it. that was my point.
Logged
spam
PGP

Posts: 28

« Reply #19 on: February 04, 2008, 02:32:49 PM »

I think that bsp should be easier to use to make maps.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
Print
Show unread posts since last visit.
Jump to:  


Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC