Author Topic: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk  (Read 7942 times)

AsThor

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 533
Re: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk
« Reply #20 on: February 05, 2008, 04:00:55 AM »
A couple of days ago, soldier (is not chriz) asked us for a 3on3 match... Only him, Coltter and Homie were online in irc. Ingame, Coltter and Homie had the names ReLaX and HoMie. The third person had the name [bM]badndrunk and that person could've only been soldier (since i haven't seen chriz in ages in irc and ingame). I think soldier used chriz account since he won't care about a ban on his account because he is inactive. So soldier would get away with it without a ban.

he doesn't have to be on IRC and on publics to be active

Henkka

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 335
Re: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk
« Reply #21 on: February 05, 2008, 07:31:28 AM »
Chriz's own fault if he tells other people his password.

Playah

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 485
Re: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk
« Reply #22 on: February 05, 2008, 09:15:57 AM »
Soldier was the one asking us for the match so i assume the 3rd player ("badndrunk") was soldier since the other 2 were neither chriz or soldier.

MosEz

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 630
Re: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk
« Reply #23 on: February 05, 2008, 10:01:54 AM »
maybe he asked and left then?

Playah

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 485
Re: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk
« Reply #24 on: February 05, 2008, 01:40:35 PM »
Was still in irc after the match...

bitmate

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 1248
Re: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk
« Reply #25 on: February 05, 2008, 06:05:04 PM »
Soldier's ISP differs from the one "[bM]badndrunk" used... </side note>

Playah

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 485
Re: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk
« Reply #26 on: February 06, 2008, 11:17:49 AM »
Seemed suspicious, thought i'd throw that in discussion but as noticed it can't be soldier. False accusation then.

jitspoe

  • Administrator
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 18801
Re: Modified Content: [bM]badndrunk
« Reply #27 on: February 06, 2008, 11:59:27 PM »
You were right - this is an old offense.  I just forgot to flag some of the modified files as being taken care of.