Author Topic: Chemical Wallhack  (Read 6897 times)

rockitude

  • Committee Member
  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 492
Chemical Wallhack
« on: July 25, 2011, 09:34:54 AM »
Committee pls check this demo, that was recorded on oXz Public 17:30 GMT+1. So many obvious shots.

prozajik

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 761
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2011, 09:39:32 AM »
agree with spain and adding my demo same map but maybe i chased few more shots then in spains demo

s0ny

  • PGP
  • Posts: 35
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #2 on: July 25, 2011, 09:44:55 AM »
look so obvious!

STeam

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 121
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2011, 09:49:55 AM »
Committee pls check this demo, that was recorded on oXz Public 17:30 GMT+1. So many obvious shots.
same opinion, much obvious..

pvtjimmy

  • Committee Member
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2098
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #4 on: July 25, 2011, 09:53:01 AM »
I see lots of rage, but no-one actually posting some times which are suposed to be suspicious

prozajik

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 761
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #5 on: July 25, 2011, 10:17:19 AM »
in my demo
16:50
16:30
from 16:10 he just knew that no one is bshoting him, with this ping i would spray on hill
14:20
13:08

Morphin

  • VM-68
  • Posts: 160
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #6 on: July 25, 2011, 10:23:13 AM »
I had to laugh at the scene where he stood under speedjump boxes and waited for the  red guy  :DDDD lmao
I think some americans will get banned next days ; )

pvtjimmy

  • Committee Member
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2098
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #7 on: July 25, 2011, 10:34:30 AM »
After checking spains demo I see no reason to suspect him of wallhacking? All shots are explainable with a little luck and movement sounds. Forgive me when my judgement here is wrong.


-edit-
I've earned something about Myres multi. Is it true or?

1) learn English
2) *click*

flamer

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 280
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #8 on: July 25, 2011, 03:14:34 PM »
Looks Obvious i'd say. Especially at the point when Sindy is high at the ramp and Chemical keeps lining at her non stop.

idias

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 605
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #9 on: July 25, 2011, 05:08:25 PM »
him*
It's a dude.

Doesn't look like wallhacks to me... Some pretty odd moments but Vanity pays a lot of attention to sounds. If you wanna ban something, ban his headset.

Rick

  • Map Committee
  • Autococker
  • Posts: 2190
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #10 on: July 26, 2011, 03:24:57 AM »
eh, some things did seem a little 'iffy'. All could be explained if a demo was supplied by Chemical.

dd9

  • PGP
  • Posts: 20
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #11 on: July 26, 2011, 03:32:13 AM »
Lol it is sure, i thought he is good, ban him nub

gath

  • PGP
  • Posts: 18
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #12 on: July 26, 2011, 05:12:23 AM »
it seems to be a wh

Riddick

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 251
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #13 on: July 26, 2011, 05:46:43 AM »
you cant ban anyone based off such inferior evidence. going off of precedent if shockwave wasnt banned for his 99.9% obvious wallhacks that jusu pointed out to his in the biggest hacking demo ive ever seen then you cant even attempt to ban chemical on what was probaby just a couple flukes. i mean lets face it... hes bad.

idias

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 605
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #14 on: July 26, 2011, 09:02:20 AM »
dd9, not trying to offend anyone but this demo is just as suspicious as some I've seen from you, like some I've seen from prozajik,  and I know you guys are not hacking. Not to mention shk's blatant demo... Doesn't necessarily mean you guys are wallhacking.

Many people have many suspicious moments... Sometimes I decide to look around a corner I usually don't look at and find someone there, that just happens. Vanity knows the map well and pays a lot of attention to sound and stuff. Honestly, I don't think it's wallhack.

dd9

  • PGP
  • Posts: 20
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #15 on: July 27, 2011, 05:30:06 AM »
i know... well, if this is not wh, so he is rlly very good

prozajik

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 761
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #16 on: July 27, 2011, 06:46:44 AM »
Doesn't look like wallhacks to me... Some pretty odd moments but Vanity pays a lot of attention to sounds....
He had 230 ping or so. I dont think sound can be that precious with ping like this. And shots he is able to perfom... maybe if he had ping 60 i would accept sound orientation but not with this ping. With this ping it seems pretty obvious to me. But still its just my opinion

Riddick

  • 68 Carbine
  • Posts: 251
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #17 on: July 27, 2011, 10:40:53 AM »
sorry to burst that bubble of yours but ping doesnt effect sound.

CheMiCal

  • Autococker
  • Posts: 690
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #18 on: July 27, 2011, 02:08:33 PM »
all i can say is get tritton AX pro's and you'll know what i'm talking about. they cost about 300$ now so GG.

coledamm

  • Stingray
  • Posts: 99
Re: Chemical Wallhack
« Reply #19 on: July 27, 2011, 03:43:47 PM »
dont lie chem, you still got prize as headphones from globalgamers league